I was watching CNN this morning and they were interviewing �Bobby-D� (Robert Davis), the 64 year old, retired school teacher who got the business end of some NOPD officers� failed stress management program. Oddly, no one here seems to have mentioned it. It really is hard to tell much from a couple minutes of video tape, but it certainly doesn�t look like there was much provocation by �Bobby-D�. And the interview this morning presented him in a most flattering light. He seems like a regular guy. And I kept thinking he looks pretty spry for a 64 year old: fit, lucid, etc. But I just don�t see where he could present much of a threat even in a blind rage as long as he�s unarmed. But then, if people are intoxicated or otherwise under the influence, then anyone can be a threat, I suppose. Bobby-D insists he hasn�t had a drink in 25 years and I have to say I believe him. And unless the police can produce a breathalyzer that states otherwise, why shouldn�t I believe him?
The second issue is the officer getting all salty with the A.P. guy, and sort of man-handling him, didn�t improve the NOPD�s image. And I understand these officers have had a rough time of it in the last month and a half or so. And I understand that being a police officer in New Orleans, even under the best circumstances isn�t really pleasant. So I wasn�t surprised that CNN was actually making excuses for the officers, but it did sort of bother me that they did. And here�s why:
Everyone who�s ever lived in New Orleans, or is familiar with the history of the NOPD knows there have always been officers within the department that were simply up to no good. Which is likely true of any city � even small towns. I tried to find out how many NOPD officers were or have been jailed compared to other cities and couldn�t find a number. But I�m sure there are plenty more in any city than the city would like there to be. But just thinking back over the years; just thinking of the stories on the news, there are what seems to be a lot. Hell, the Feds even came in at one point because things were so bad.
Now before everyone starts throwing hate comments at me, please hear me out. Can you hold the entire NOPD responsible for the actions of officers that commit crimes or exhibit poor judgment? No, I don�t think you can. Does it reflect poorly on the entire NOPD? Absolutely it does. Does it reflect poorly on the city and undermine potential visitors� sense of security? Certainly. But those are easy questions. The hard questions come in the form of: If tensions are so high that judgment is impaired, are the police more of a liability that a help? Should certain officers be asked to go on administrative leave and be sent to counseling to help them cope with the situation, even against their will? Which begs the question; is the city doing enough to help ensure the overall health of ALL their people in uniform? And, the one I find most difficult to churn around in my head: Is this a case of a good officer under duress who made a bad decision when confronted with what was perceived to be a volatile situation, or is this just another case of bad cops doing what bad cops always do, only this time we�re making excuses for them?
Luckily, I am not obligated to come to some final decision on the matter. But somebody, somewhere, will be and I do not envy them this task. These are very difficult questions and there may be no way to know the truth. And in this, they are largely academic questions; still, I do think they are worth thinking about. And I hope that the rest of New Orleans does too. The city became, in some respects, what people let it become over some 300 years � the good and the bad. We may need to pay very close attention now to what we decide to let the city become. Justice and equality are composed of the decisions that come out of situations like the one Mr. Davis and the NOPD have brought to our attention. If this is a fresh start for New Orleans as a city, then it is important that the die be cast now, with this situation. It should be cast fairly, justly, and with the best interest of all parties at heart. Anything less is unacceptable.